Palabras clave
EU
inter-regionalismo
comercio
negociaciones
institucionalismo
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo versa sobre las investigaciones de procesos de negociaciones internacionales y muestra cómo su dinámica institucional influye en la capacidad de las instituciones regionales para concretar sus propios objetivos. El caso elegido es el de las negociaciones comerciales entre la UE y el MERCOSUR, el cual permite evaluar tanto las capacidades de las instituciones como los fundamentos dinámicos de la interacción entre ellos. Con un diseño de investigación cualitativa, el proyecto examina las experiencias de los negociadores de ambos continentes que han participado directamente en las negociaciones entre la UE y el MERCOSUR. Los resultados muestran que, si bien un alto grado de institucionalización mejora los procesos de aprendizaje, la experiencia estratégica y la legitimidad externa, conlleva un alto riesgo de rigidez y, por lo tanto, de fracaso. En el artículo de investigación se sacan conclusiones precisas sobre la forma en que estudiamos las instituciones regionales y la manera en que su configuración influye en las opciones estratégicas de las partes involucradas.
Citas
AGENCE EUROPE PRESS. Talks for EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Nearing Finishing Line, 2017.
BEACH, Derek; PEDERSEN, Rasmus. Process Tracing Methods – Foundations and Guidelines, University of Michigan Press. University of Michigan Press, 2012.
BOUZAS Roberto, DA MOTTA VEIGA, Pedro; TORRENT, Ramon. In-Depth Analysis of Mercosur Integration, Its Prospectives and the Effects Thereof on the Market Access of EU Goods, Services and Investment. 2002, 1–530. Available in: <http://www.opalc.org/images/INRE/in-depth-analysis-of-mercosur-integration.pdf>
BOUZAS, Roberto; FANELLI, José María. “Mercosur: Integración y Crecimiento”, Programa MERCOSUR, 2001.
BRADFORD, Anu. “Exporting Standards: The Externalization of the EU’s Regulatory Power via Markets”. International Review of Law and Economics. 2012, vol 42, n° 3, 158–73. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004>
CAMROUX, David. “Interregionalism or Merely a Fourth-Level Game? An Examination of the EU-ASEAN Relationship”. East Asia 27. 2010, n° 1, 57–77. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-009-9096-x>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia. “Do Agents ‘Run Amok’? A Comparison of Agency Slack in the EU and US Trade Policy in the Doha”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2013, vol 15, n° 1, 20–36. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2012.754152>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugenia. “Variation in EU Member States’ Preferences and the Commission’s Discretion in the Doha Round Variation in EU Member States’ Preferences and the Commission’s Discretion in the Doha Round”.
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia; MEUNIER, Sophie. “Speaking with a Single Voice: Internal Cohesiveness and External Effectiveness of the EU in Global Governance”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 1, n° 7, 961–79. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.913219>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia; MEUNIER, Sophie. “When Speaking with a Single Voice Isn’t Enough: Bargaining Power (a)Symmetry and EU External Effectiveness in Global Trade Governance”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 21, n° 7, 980–95. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.912146>
DESIDERÁ, Neto; WALTER, Antonio. “The Evolution of Mercosur Behaving as an International Coalition, 1991-2012”. Contexto Internacional. 2016, vol 28, n° 2, 593–620. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380200004>
DOCTOR, Mahruk. “Brazil’s Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20”. Global Society. 2015, vol 29, n°, 286–300. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1025041>
DÜR, Andreas; ZIMMERMANN, Hubert. “Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007, vol 45, n° 4, 771–87. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00747.x>
ELSIG, Manfred. “The EU’s Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007, vol 45, n° 4, 927–48. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00754.x>
GARCÍA, María. “The European Union and Latin America: ‘Transformative Power Europe’ versus the Realities of Economic Interests”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2015, vol 28, n° , 621–40. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.647762>
GEHRING, Thomas; URBANSKI, Kevin; OBERTHÜR, Sebastian. “The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017; vol 55, n° 4, 727–43. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12530>
GOLDTHAU, Andreas and SITTER, Nick. “A Liberal Actor in a Realist World? The Commission and the External Dimension of the Single Market for Energy”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 21, n° 10, 1452–72. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.912251>
GOMEZ ARANTZA, Arana. “European Union Policy-Making towards Mercosur”. In The European Union’s Policy towards Mercosur, 2018. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526108401.00009>
GÓMEZ-MERA, Laura. “Domestic Constraints on Regional Cooperation: Explaining Trade Conflict in MERCOSUR”. Review of International Political Economy. 2009, vol 16, n° 5, 746–77. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802454216>
GRUGEL, Jean. “New Regionalism and Modes of Governance - Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America”. European Journal of International Relations. 2004, vol 10, n° 4, 603–26. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047850>
HSIEH, Hsiu-Fang. “Three Approache to Qualitative Content Analysis”. Qualitative Health Research. 2005, vol 15, n° 9, 1277–88. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687>
KRAPOHL Sebastian. “New Institutionalism Meets International Political Economy: A New Approach to the Study of Regional Integration Dynamics In- and Outside of Europe”. Working Paper Prepared for Presentation at the GARNET Conference ‘The European Union in International Affairs’. 2008, n° 24.
LUÍZA, Patricia; KEGEL, Mohamed. “MERCOSUR and Its Current Relationship to the European Union,” Zentrum Für Europäische Integrationsforschung Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn, 2012.
MALAMUD, Andrés. “La Unión Europea, Del Interregionalismo Con América Latina a La Asociación Estratégica Con Brasil”. Revista CIDOB d’afers Internacionals. 2012, 219–30.
MALAMUD, Andrés. “Mercosur Turns 15: Between Rising Rhetoric and Declining Achievement”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2005, vol 18, n° 3, 421–36. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500238068, p. 526>
MALAMUD, Andrés. “Presidential Diplomacy and the Institutional Underpinnings of Mercosur: An Empirical Examination”. Latin American Research Review. 2005, vol 40, n° 1, 138–64.
MATTHEIS, Frank; WUNDERLICH, Uwe. “Regional Actorness and Interregional Relations: ASEAN, the EU and Mercosur”. Journal of European Integration. 2017, vol 39, n° 6, 723–38. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1333503>
MEUNIER, Sophie and NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2006, vol 13, n° 6, 906–25.
MEUNIER, Sophie and NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. “Who Speaks for Europe? The Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1999, vol 37, n° 3, 477–501. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00174>
MEUNIER, Sophie. “A Faustian Bargain or Just a Good Bargain? Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Politics in Europe”. Asia Eur Journal. 2014, 143–58. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-014-0382-x>
MEUNIER, Sophie. “Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007. vol 45, n° 4, 905–26. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00753.x>
MORAVCSIK, Andrew. “In Defence of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002, vol 40, n° 4, 603–24. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00390>
MORIN JEAN, Frédéric and CARTA, Caterina. “Overlapping and Evolving European Discourses on Market Liberalization”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2014, vol 16, n° 1, 117–32. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12021>
NUTTALL, S. European Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
PUTNAM, Robert. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”. International Organization. 1988, vol 42, n° 3.
RÜLAND, Jürgen. “Balancers, Multilateral Utilities or Regional Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2010, vol 17, n° 8, 1271–83. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.513586>
SCHELLING, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
SHANNON, Sarah; DAMRO, Chad. “Market Power Europe: Exploring a Dynamic Conceptual Framework Market Power Europe: Exploring a Dynamic Conceptual Framework”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015, 1–19. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1046903>
SÖDERBAUM, Fredrik, STALGREN, Patrik; VAN LANGENHOVE, Luk. “The EU as a Global Actor and the Dynamics of Interregionalism: A Comparative Analysis”. Journal of European Integration. vol 27, n° 3, 365–80. Available in: h
WOOLCOCK, Stephen. “EU Trade and Investment Policymaking After The”. 2010, 22–25. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-010-0321-z>
YOUNG Alasdair R. “European Trade Policy in Interesting Times European Trade Policy in Interesting Times”. Journal of European Integration. 2017, vol 39, n° 7, 909–23. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1371705>.
YOUNG, Alasdair R. Trade Policy in a Changing EU and an Uncertain World, 2017.
YOUNG, Alasdair R.; PETERSON, John. “The EU and the New Trade Politics”. Journal of European Public Policy. vol 13, n° 6, 795–814. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600837104>
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión